From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aba45bafa1e74e48a3673c23327165bfdb500d5eaff4d94d3fe1d086f0b88e9f
Message ID: <9308121539.AA10228@smds.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-12 15:48:12 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 08:48:12 PDT
From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 08:48:12 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Or
Message-ID: <9308121539.AA10228@smds.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
gtoal@gtoal.com sez-
> That was smoke and mirrors by people who understand chaos better than
> they understand encryption. All it boils down to is a synchronised
> pair of (not very good) PRNGs.
> ...
> Forget it. It's a dead end.
What it is is PRNGs that can synchronize without publishing their
states. If this could be done with strong PRNGs, you'd have something.
-fnerd
quote me
Return to August 1993
Return to “fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)”
1993-08-12 (Thu, 12 Aug 93 08:48:12 PDT) - Re: Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Or - fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)