1993-08-17 - ANON: alt.sexual.abuse.recovery

Header Data

From: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
To: julf@penet.FI
Message Hash: abe6bebd446c73f5b6ff4236da876ab698a4c2e169555fd665b4d7305c2277e9
Message ID: <9308171628.AA20551@servo>
Reply To: <9308171047.ab22248@penet.penet.FI>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-17 16:30:20 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 09:30:20 PDT

Raw message

From: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 09:30:20 PDT
To: julf@penet.FI
Subject: ANON: alt.sexual.abuse.recovery
In-Reply-To: <9308171047.ab22248@penet.penet.FI>
Message-ID: <9308171628.AA20551@servo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


One question is how he will enforce his ban on encryption if he only
rarely reads the messages passing through. He could probably write a
shell script that looks for PGP headers, but these could be stripped off.
He could probably look for ascii-encoded files with a flat character
distribution, but these could be uuencoded or binhexed.

Perhaps it's time to integrate one of the steganographic techniques
into the remailers as a configuration option. By inflating the size of
the messages it hides, that will increase the load through the
machines that don't like encrypted messages, but that's life.

Phil





Thread