From: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
To: julf@penet.FI
Message Hash: abe6bebd446c73f5b6ff4236da876ab698a4c2e169555fd665b4d7305c2277e9
Message ID: <9308171628.AA20551@servo>
Reply To: <9308171047.ab22248@penet.penet.FI>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-17 16:30:20 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 09:30:20 PDT
From: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 09:30:20 PDT
To: julf@penet.FI
Subject: ANON: alt.sexual.abuse.recovery
In-Reply-To: <9308171047.ab22248@penet.penet.FI>
Message-ID: <9308171628.AA20551@servo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
One question is how he will enforce his ban on encryption if he only
rarely reads the messages passing through. He could probably write a
shell script that looks for PGP headers, but these could be stripped off.
He could probably look for ascii-encoded files with a flat character
distribution, but these could be uuencoded or binhexed.
Perhaps it's time to integrate one of the steganographic techniques
into the remailers as a configuration option. By inflating the size of
the messages it hides, that will increase the load through the
machines that don't like encrypted messages, but that's life.
Phil
Return to August 1993
Return to “karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)”