From: guy@theporch.raider.net (Jonathan Guy)
To: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
Message Hash: b5610ccc1fa65da2008dee05629a28b5eceb0bcb8ca123ebbdb55798904e46ea
Message ID: <m0oQBKY-0009UVC@theporch.raider.net>
Reply To: <9308102004.AA01064@banff.procase.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-11 08:57:15 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 01:57:15 PDT
From: guy@theporch.raider.net (Jonathan Guy)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 01:57:15 PDT
To: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
Subject: Re: patent on remote cash transactions?
In-Reply-To: <9308102004.AA01064@banff.procase.com>
Message-ID: <m0oQBKY-0009UVC@theporch.raider.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> American Public Radio reported yesterday that some company was granted
> a broad patent on remote cash transactions--they mentioned an article
> in the NYTimes recently (NYT does patent reporting on Saturday typically, but
> sometimes they do it in the business section on other days; I don't get
> NYT anymore...); anyone here more about this? Is this yet another
> example of bozo software patents? If anyone finds out more, please post.
I read the NYT article, which was on the second page of the business section
in Monday's edition. Apparently the patent was granted to a Virginia
company (don't recall the name, and that may be the wrong state... <sigh>)
and covers virtually anything that provides ATM-like functionality from a
home computer. The exact boundaries of the patent weren't discussed in the
article, but I seriously doubt it would affect a digital cash system.
--
Jonathan R. Guy | The opinions expressed above are not
E-Mail: guy@theporch.raider.net | those of my employer. Nor are
Snail: P.O. Box 158325 | they my own. Actually, I copied them
Nashville, TN 37215 | from the encyclopedia.
Return to August 1993
Return to “peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)”