From: norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ba0c7492df8d1acad2e9148e87c17dacd9fa8a8f3d09902b9368a301d718cf8d
Message ID: <9308270218.AA19958@netcom3.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-27 02:22:37 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Aug 93 19:22:37 PDT
From: norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 93 19:22:37 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Commercial PGP: Verifying Trustworthiness
Message-ID: <9308270218.AA19958@netcom3.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
cdodhner@indirect.com (Christian D. Odhner) says:
> I could very well be wrong about this one, but since pgp uses a random
> idea session key each time you encrypt, wouldn't that in fact ensure that
> no two encryptions of the same file with the same public key are ever the
> same? Why then would random stuff be needed?
I knew that! I forgot that! Thanks for reminding me. Back to the drawing board!
A protocol where the user controlled the session key would be more awkward
but would solve that problem. On the otherhand that isn't the PGP protocol.
Return to August 1993
Return to “norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)”
1993-08-27 (Thu, 26 Aug 93 19:22:37 PDT) - Re: Commercial PGP: Verifying Trustworthiness - norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)