1993-08-12 - Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Or

Header Data

From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c305cfcd9dd0777eb93f33148a934f9c9ff49e559a74ae96c6ef6d63be17dafb
Message ID: <4733@an-teallach.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-12 10:28:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 03:28:07 PDT

Raw message

From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 03:28:07 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Or
Message-ID: <4733@an-teallach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <19930811185438.1.TK@ROCKY.AI.MIT.EDU> tk@reagan.ai.mit.edu writes:
 > with some op amps.  If you want to play, there's an article in SciAm
 > this month on building a chaotic "encryption" machine.  It probably
 > provides acceptable security if you use triple DES on signals prior to
 > sending them.

That was smoke and mirrors by people who understand chaos better than
they understand encryption.  All it boils down to is a synchronised
pair of (not very good) PRNGs.  It's not a substitute for a one-time
pad by a long chalk, which is how they seem to be using it.  Basically
they've just reinvented every schoolboy's exor encryption program all
over again, this time with the latest 'chaos' buzzword thrown in to make
it sound hip.

Forget it.  It's a dead end.

G
===
Personal mail to gtoal@gtoal.com (I read it in the evenings)
Business mail to gtoal@an-teallach.com (Be careful with the spelling!)
Faxes to An Teallach Limited: 031 662 4678  Voice: 031 668 1550 x212






Thread