From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d25069b3d8059db2c2088e680fd5eb65d874ea81191564826aca1837aedd8983
Message ID: <9308241508.AA28992@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-24 20:41:56 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Aug 93 13:41:56 PDT
From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 93 13:41:56 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: syntax for cut lines
Message-ID: <9308241508.AA28992@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Mr. Anonymous sent the following to cypherpunks, through one remailer:
> > I think the Hall Remailer at <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> recognizes a
> > "cut line" of
> > --ignore--
> > I tried this and it failed the first time, but worked the second.
> > You should try a message to yourself before relying on it.
> Let us try it here and see how it works; the following line contains the
> kiss-off "ignore" and everything that shows beyond it was added without
> my intention:
And it worked...
I would recommend one change to the handling of cut lines like --ignore-- :
- leave the cut line in the message, just cut the stuff after it
This lets you use one --ignore-- line to chop of any trailers from multiple
remailers, so you don't risk building up a trail. Getting rid of the
first one is obviously the most critical, but the rest can also be a risk.
Also, someone has commented that most people who use anonymous remailers
test them by sending a message to themselves before sending it to their
real destination. If your intended recipient is on the same system
or group of systems that you are, this is a traffic analysis risk...
Bill Stewart
Return to August 1993
Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com”
1993-08-24 (Tue, 24 Aug 93 13:41:56 PDT) - syntax for cut lines - wcs@anchor.ho.att.com