1993-08-13 - Second Tier remailers …

Header Data

From: kelly@netcom.com (Kelly Goen)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d923fc5a67a1673f6a623bb5c0dcb99a359463ccbe37115665e2aa6418582f99
Message ID: <9308130954.AA08659@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-13 09:53:28 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 02:53:28 PDT

Raw message

From: kelly@netcom.com (Kelly Goen)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 02:53:28 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Second Tier remailers ...
Message-ID: <9308130954.AA08659@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 To All,
       The idea of second tier remailers may be MUCH more palatable to all to
run as they add more hops in the chain... as they dont introduce such a visible
liability to the operator they could possibly be a LOT easier to propagate
than first tier remailers. One additional facility neede is the ability
to recognize a signed and/or encrypted control message to update their
remailer maps from a periodic posting...maybe this last needs a lot of thought.
   cheers
   kelly
-- 





Thread