From: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
To: tcmay@netcom.com
Message Hash: df9339e2c96a6f833c53f671535fc7ef842a3a66db0fa1a060496022a4346865
Message ID: <9308140110.AA02254@banff.procase.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-14 01:13:06 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 18:13:06 PDT
From: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 18:13:06 PDT
To: tcmay@netcom.com
Subject: Re: CA online legislative database access
Message-ID: <9308140110.AA02254@banff.procase.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I agree with sentiments against a direct democracy for all the reasons
given and some extra reasons: laws should have expiration dates and
a better feedback process is needed to determine whether particular
laws are beneficial (hmm, sounds like PPL.)
The real problem seems to be a general lack of education and wealth, but
there is always the bell curve--such things will always be unevenly
distributed.
However, tracking proposed laws via the net creates the possibility
of anyone being able to have a cheap lobbyist--the stuff can
be posted and filtered, etc. This has nothing to do with people
proposing stupid laws whenever they feel like it (this would require
more significant legal changes).
Paul E. Baclace
peb@procase.com
Return to August 1993
Return to “peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)”
1993-08-14 (Fri, 13 Aug 93 18:13:06 PDT) - Re: CA online legislative database access - peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)