From: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: edec6cb6ee242188a61d4426c62ae54471865cbd3b60ce1c07b24e907f4a3215
Message ID: <9308190108.AA11116@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-19 01:10:47 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 18:10:47 PDT
From: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 18:10:47 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: ANON: remailer list
Message-ID: <9308190108.AA11116@tamsun.tamu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> >11: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu
> >12: remail@tamaix.tamu.edu
> These last two seem to remail from the same address. Are there really two,
> with one automatically feeding into the other as a two-tier? What's the
> deal?
tamsun and tamaix are two different machines which share, NFS-ed, user
directories; hence, any mail sent to tamsun or tamaix goes through the same bit
of remailing script. They both work independantly, however, and I decided to
keep both in case one of the machines goes down for some reason.
> I'll send this message to remail@tamaix.tamu.edu to illustrate. I tried to,
> and this message bounced. This is the second try, to
> remail@tamsun.tamu.edu.
Let me know via email to remail@tamsun.tamu.edu if you still can't get your
message through. It should work though.
--
[ Carlos Macedo Gomes ][ Quis Custodiet ][: .8. :]------
[ gomes@tamu.edu ][ Ipsos Custodes? ][ . ooo . ]000000
[ cmghelp@tamsun.tamu.edu ][ ][ : =o(Y)o= : ]000000
[ My views- not TAMU's ][30 37 40 N, 96 20 03 W][oo .ooooo. oo]------
Return to August 1993
Return to “remail@tamsun.tamu.edu”
1993-08-19 (Wed, 18 Aug 93 18:10:47 PDT) - Re: ANON: remailer list - remail@tamsun.tamu.edu