1993-08-13 - No Subject
Header Data
From: Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f6add4265655810fca64940aa62f6431419159ce2f74ba3bdd18a328cdeb14d4
Message ID: <9308130131.AA14438@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-13 02:22:55 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 19:22:55 PDT
Raw message
From: Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 19:22:55 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <9308130131.AA14438@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Is there any reason why a single mail address should have only one
pseudonym? Along with declaring a private password, why not declare any
number of public names? One password per name would be nice. Another plus -
then penet could be chained between cypherpunk remailers. Now this is not
possible because it identifies users with their 'From:' field.
Thread
Return to August 1993
Return to “Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>”
1993-08-13 (Thu, 12 Aug 93 19:22:55 PDT) - No Subject - Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>