1993-08-20 - Re: T. Wells & Anonymity

Header Data

From: T. William Wells <bill@twwells.com>
To: rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu (toad.com!cypherpunks,penet.fi!julf, gnu.ai.mit.edu!rjc)
Message Hash: fb73526dd3e7f1bcec732d8b524227d7a161d243469695f08f00d0b016c21bb4
Message ID: <9308200739.AA01030@twwells.com>
Reply To: <m0oTG7R-00021zC@khijol>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-20 12:16:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Aug 93 05:16:33 PDT

Raw message

From: T. William Wells <bill@twwells.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 93 05:16:33 PDT
To: rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu (toad.com!cypherpunks,penet.fi!julf, gnu.ai.mit.edu!rjc)
Subject: Re: T. Wells & Anonymity
In-Reply-To: <m0oTG7R-00021zC@khijol>
Message-ID: <9308200739.AA01030@twwells.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I've written a long post in answer to Ed and Julf's message.
However, I've decided that it's best not to burden everyone with a
couple of hundred lines of stuff whose content can be summarized
as "there is little truth in their message and what little there
is is told in such a way as to be misleading". If anyone cares to
listen to my full rant (excepting Ed, whom I simply refuse to
deal with), drop me a line and I'll send it to you.

Thread

• Return to August 1993

• Return to “Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>”
• Return to “khijol!erc@apple.com (Ed Carp)”
• Return to ““L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>”
• Return to “rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Ray)”

• Return to “T. William Wells <bill@twwells.com>”

• 1993-08-19 (Wed, 18 Aug 93 23:25:53 PDT) - T. Wells & Anonymity - “L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
  • 1993-08-19 (Thu, 19 Aug 93 02:10:45 PDT) - Re: T. Wells & Anonymity - rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Ray)
    • 1993-08-19 (Thu, 19 Aug 93 04:16:19 PDT) - Re: T. Wells & Anonymity - Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
      • 1993-08-19 (Thu, 19 Aug 93 13:06:05 PDT) - Re: T. Wells & Anonymity - khijol!erc@apple.com (Ed Carp)
        • 1993-08-20 (Fri, 20 Aug 93 05:16:33 PDT) - Re: T. Wells & Anonymity - T. William Wells <bill@twwells.com>