1993-09-09 - Re: Viacrypt export?

Header Data

From: smb@research.att.com
To: b44729@achilles.ctd.anl.gov (Samuel Pigg)
Message Hash: 0154a4127bbb654679d187e59ee0df4e2ef842f23ac35d34b8d18e2f7b6c7bdf
Message ID: <9309090240.AA29022@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-09 02:42:10 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Sep 93 19:42:10 PDT

Raw message

From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 93 19:42:10 PDT
To: b44729@achilles.ctd.anl.gov (Samuel Pigg)
Subject: Re: Viacrypt export?
Message-ID: <9309090240.AA29022@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	 	Alex> Why would people in Europe want to buy an exported
	 	Alex> Viacrypt when it's completely legal for them to use PGP,
	 	Alex> which is free and which is built from published source
	 	Alex> code?

	 I wouldn't, but most corporations don't like purchasing software
	 without the safety blanket of commercial support. (At least in the
	 states. I assume it's the same in europe.)

It's not a matter of a safety blanket, it's where you choose to spend
your time and effort.  A well-supported application can easily pay
for itself in decreased staff time.





Thread