From: strick – henry strickland <strick@osc>
To: Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
Message Hash: 11c5598541b70d925ce58286d5e81ec4a30196b3a7d2fcaeca4dfeed92770f89
Message ID: <9309191943.AA02835@versant.com>
Reply To: <9309190629.AA02026@flammulated.owlnet.rice.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-19 21:19:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 14:19:47 PDT
From: strick -- henry strickland <strick@osc>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 14:19:47 PDT
To: Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: GOPHER: dealing with postscript
In-Reply-To: <9309190629.AA02026@flammulated.owlnet.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <9309191943.AA02835@versant.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
THUS SPAKE Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>:
#
# Also, where is the "Digital Silk Road" paper? I'd like to put the
# text version in the "Digital Cash" section. I'd also like to put the
# two reports at cwi up, but those are postscript...
Suggestion: Put them under a gopher subdirectory named "Postscript
Files" inside the directory they are appropriate to. Then by default
people see the plaintext files and the "Postscript Files"
subdirectory. If people are postscript-capable, they can then go down
the next level.
Or append "(Postscript)" to the displayed file name, to make
it clear that way.
As MIME becomes integrated into internet tools and widely
available, this problem will solve itself. "application/postscript"
is already a standard MIME Content-Type.
In the meantime, don't shy away from making information available,
especially if it is in a format as "widely accessible" as postscript is.
strick
Return to September 1993
Return to “strick – henry strickland <strick@osc>”