1993-09-30 - Re: fido encryption.

Header Data

From: stig@netcom.com (Stig)
To: msattler@netcom.com (Michael Sattler)
Message Hash: 1c386731944df2262be54d6d7b2374415663b60516e4f56fc85fb58d7a40aac3
Message ID: <9309302054.AA15926@netcom3.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9309300753.AA29492@netcom.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-30 20:56:38 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 13:56:38 PDT

Raw message

From: stig@netcom.com (Stig)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 13:56:38 PDT
To: msattler@netcom.com (Michael Sattler)
Subject: Re: fido encryption.
In-Reply-To: <9309300753.AA29492@netcom.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9309302054.AA15926@netcom3.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At CFP (or maybe it was an event at Modern Times in SF just before CFP...) I
remember some people talking about this fidonet pickiness.  There is also a
large number of fido sites that DO pass encrypted traffic.  They have their
own "backbone" for encrypted traffic, too.

I think that Tom Jennings was one of the people who was talking about
this...which makes perfect sense, since I think he started fidonet...

    Stig


;; __________________________________________________________________________
;; Stig@netcom.com                            netcom.com:/pub/stig/00-PGP-KEY
;; It's hard to be cutting-edge at your own pace...   32 DF B9 19 AE 28 D1 7A
;; Bullet-proof code cannot stand up to teflon bugs.  A3 9D 0B 1A 33 13 4D 7F






Thread