1993-09-28 - Re: Verilog encryption broken
Header Data
From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.fi>
To: Bruce R Koball <bkoball@well.sf.ca.us>
Message Hash: 21286873eda5e8e57107a4111cbb2fa67361a03968f69e9fc8421656c879a434
Message ID: <199309280736.AA20648@mail.eunet.fi>
Reply To: <93Sep27.173714pdt.14125-3@well.sf.ca.us>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-28 07:41:24 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 Sep 93 00:41:24 PDT
Raw message
From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.fi>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 93 00:41:24 PDT
To: Bruce R Koball <bkoball@well.sf.ca.us>
Subject: Re: Verilog encryption broken
In-Reply-To: <93Sep27.173714pdt.14125-3@well.sf.ca.us>
Message-ID: <199309280736.AA20648@mail.eunet.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> A recent anonymous posting in the comp.lang.verilog newsgroup on Usenet
> has generated a raging controversey and threatens to shake up the
> electronic design automation (EDA) community.
> P.S. Does anyone on this list know if the offending post was made
> through an anonymous remailer? -brk
It was posted using anon.penet.fi. I have already been contacted by Verilog's
legal representatives.
Julf
Thread
Return to September 1993
- Return to “Bruce R Koball <bkoball@well.sf.ca.us>”
Return to “Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.fi>”
- 1993-09-28 (Mon, 27 Sep 93 17:41:21 PDT) - Verilog encryption broken - Bruce R Koball <bkoball@well.sf.ca.us>
- 1993-09-28 (Tue, 28 Sep 93 00:41:24 PDT) - Re: Verilog encryption broken - Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.fi>