1993-09-08 - Re: Remailing

Header Data

From: Marc Horowitz <marc@Athena.MIT.EDU>
To: frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)
Message Hash: 233635f258bc172d210e27e88cfee8c871ed739c3c3e413e74f69b8cd0f019d3
Message ID: <9309080351.AA11068@binkley.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <9309080005.AA08479@bwnmr4.harvard.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-08 03:56:47 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Sep 93 20:56:47 PDT

Raw message

From: Marc Horowitz <marc@Athena.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 93 20:56:47 PDT
To: frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)
Subject: Re: Remailing
In-Reply-To: <9309080005.AA08479@bwnmr4.harvard.edu>
Message-ID: <9309080351.AA11068@binkley.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>> How does this make TA trivial?
>> I am assuming that batch mailings or staggered mailings are occuring.

That is not currently the case.

And even if it were, sending messages to yourself is going to add a
significant "known quantity" to the remailer traffic.  The more an
attacker knows, the less he needs to figure out.

		Marc

Thread

• Return to September 1993

• Return to “frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)”

• Return to “Marc Horowitz <marc@Athena.MIT.EDU>”

• 1993-09-07 (Tue, 7 Sep 93 16:16:45 PDT) - Remailing - frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)
  • 1993-09-07 (Tue, 7 Sep 93 16:52:41 PDT) - Re: Remailing - Marc Horowitz <marc@Athena.MIT.EDU>
    • 1993-09-08 (Tue, 7 Sep 93 17:11:46 PDT) - Re: Remailing - frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)
      • 1993-09-08 (Tue, 7 Sep 93 20:56:47 PDT) - Re: Remailing - Marc Horowitz <marc@Athena.MIT.EDU>
        • 1993-09-09 (Wed, 8 Sep 93 19:08:04 PDT) - Re: Remailing - frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)