From: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2b58bdf19ce45af8fc7d22aec715759d19ef8d8291d4021236afc6ba1d2a2862
Message ID: <199309201553.AA01896@misc.glarp.com>
Reply To: <9309201255.AA14286@crypto.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-20 15:56:10 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 20 Sep 93 08:56:10 PDT
From: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 93 08:56:10 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: meaningless rumor
In-Reply-To: <9309201255.AA14286@crypto.com>
Message-ID: <199309201553.AA01896@misc.glarp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Assuming that whoevever implemented PGP did not himself import the
> cipher, but based the implementation on the EUROCRYPT '90 paper
> that was 'imported' by Springer-Verlag, I don't understand what
> the basis would be for such a charge. Now an indictment against
> Springer for shipping the proceedings (which contained C source
> code for IDEA) into the US - that would be interesting...
Wait a minute. Does ITAR actuall prohibit importing crypto _to_
the US? I've never heard of it being used this way.
brad
Return to September 1993
Return to “smb@research.att.com”