1993-09-05 - Re: Remailer Reliability

Header Data

From: sameer@netcom.com (Sameer Parekh)
To: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
Message Hash: 2cad4395048620b9a6c5fb573fd360e73b34b679b271f415e47dd5f536d5cd1a
Message ID: <9309050109.AA13068@netcom5.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9309040413.AA23647@netcom5.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-05 01:15:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Sep 93 18:15:47 PDT

Raw message

From: sameer@netcom.com (Sameer Parekh)
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 93 18:15:47 PDT
To: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
Subject: Re: Remailer Reliability
In-Reply-To: <9309040413.AA23647@netcom5.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9309050109.AA13068@netcom5.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> I only hope I can continue weathering the storm of heavy traffic, on
> top of other email lists. :-)
> 	Doug
	Good luck.. 

	Didn't someone mention a while back a scheme by which a
message can be split up into a bunch of parts and only requires about
50% of them or so to be completely rebuilt? Something like that would
be very useful I think to deal with remailer reliability problems.
That would require a good deal more user work though.

-- 
Sameer
sameer@netcom.com

Thread

• Return to September 1993

• Return to “b44729@achilles.ctd.anl.gov (Samuel Pigg)”
• Return to “doug@netcom5.netcom.com (Doug Merritt)”

• Return to “sameer@netcom.com (Sameer Parekh)”

• 1993-09-04 (Fri, 3 Sep 93 21:17:15 PDT) - Re: Remailer Reliability - doug@netcom5.netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
  • 1993-09-04 (Fri, 3 Sep 93 22:15:35 PDT) - Remailer Reliability - b44729@achilles.ctd.anl.gov (Samuel Pigg)
    • 1993-09-04 (Fri, 3 Sep 93 22:55:35 PDT) - Mistake (CRM’s author == Alex Strasheim)! - b44729@achilles.ctd.anl.gov (Samuel Pigg)
  • 1993-09-05 (Sat, 4 Sep 93 18:15:47 PDT) - Re: Remailer Reliability - sameer@netcom.com (Sameer Parekh)