From: frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)
To: klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu
Message Hash: 504fa55906b33cb79b5dacff7ad61ec63857c91abe0e70b0789f975758d60f90
Message ID: <9309090215.AA12523@bwnmr4.harvard.edu>
Reply To: <m0oaKhR-0001zxC@rebma.rebma.mn.org>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-09 02:23:07 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Sep 93 19:23:07 PDT
From: frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 93 19:23:07 PDT
To: klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu
Subject: Re: Remailing
In-Reply-To: <m0oaKhR-0001zxC@rebma.rebma.mn.org>
Message-ID: <9309090215.AA12523@bwnmr4.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> One possible problem is that the final destination must then be
> available to every remailer.
[explanation removed]
ok, this one I can understand to be a problem. Can anyone beat this?
> Besides, some people may have set up anonymous remailers that aren't
> public or haven't been announced.
Well, if the mailer hasn't been announced or made public, then it
obviously won't be on the list of mailers that Remailer is choosing it's
ping targets from.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLI6RirbAlE4AqlTZAQGmzQP8CdOdShWx9SWcjeID/rdaBeStPmmfs4sW
o44Mccp1zKcHRicrr7ELWyEQ28zu7mBGjAuVFKjMDrta8i17sRYvsDchissH+mgw
w0qKMge9kYaHvfgrP2K8XMoE79tu3EATBPp32HTF3bBNtrUVV2OPpRSocbtcX4Vc
4VULcmUI4hk=
=1YCi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1993
Return to “nobody@rebma.rebma.mn.org”