From: stig@netcom.com (Stig)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6b45c501b8fd9050fc4ebc68bf83621761518a2d9cd2ba6e485f616e8e156e82
Message ID: <9309150426.AA00948@netcom2.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9309150353.AA06198@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-15 04:29:07 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Sep 93 21:29:07 PDT
From: stig@netcom.com (Stig)
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 93 21:29:07 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: more than spread spectrum
In-Reply-To: <9309150353.AA06198@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
Message-ID: <9309150426.AA00948@netcom2.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In <9309150353.AA06198@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>, Carl Ellison wrote...
> There are alternatives to spread spectrum, if we're threatened with
> loss of freedom to communicate.
>
> We could lay our own wires/fibers.
>
Well, we'd like crypto for the masses and I don't think that the masses are
yet ready to put out the bucks for spread spectrum boards and infrared laser
communications gear... It'd be really nice to have such a decentralized
network, though.
> We could set up a mesh network of infrared lasers through the air. Last
> time I looked, there were no laws against shining lights out your window as
> long as they didn't bother anyone. An infrared laser could hardly bother
> anyone.
>
...
> very low range radio, .... Each card would connect to three or more
> neighbors and become part of the global mesh. Adaptive routing with no
> global map would suffice for the card and would keep the whole system
> peer-to-peer with no need for central control and no chance for central
> tapping.
>
This would be the perfect network in which to deploy DC nets.... (dining
cryptographers).
;; __________________________________________________________________________
;; Stig@netcom.com netcom.com:/pub/stig/00-PGP-KEY
;; It's hard to be cutting-edge at your own pace... 32 DF B9 19 AE 28 D1 7A
;; Bullet-proof code cannot stand up to teflon bugs. A3 9D 0B 1A 33 13 4D 7F
Return to September 1993
Return to “stig@netcom.com (Stig)”