From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 747dd0d1c8106fb18ef8ef1b23999774417d125937a41cd1ab3a8e1b46100d52
Message ID: <9309212218.AA09396@smds.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-21 22:32:45 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 Sep 93 15:32:45 PDT
From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 93 15:32:45 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Subjects in anon msgs
Message-ID: <9309212218.AA09396@smds.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Someone writes:
> What do you put in the Subject: line of an encrypted or anonymous
> message?
>
> We need something standard to prevent traffic analysis on this field.
...
Isn't it okay to have the subject appear in the last hop,
according to a :: field in the second-to-last message?
::Remail-with-Subject: All Right Bugsy Lets Get Down To Brass Tacks
With remailers that unencrypt at each hop, this doesn't seem a
problem to me.
With remailers that accept unencrypted input, this is no more of a
steganoweakness than the body of the message already is.
-fnerd@smds.com
Return to September 1993
Return to “fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)”
1993-09-21 (Tue, 21 Sep 93 15:32:45 PDT) - Subjects in anon msgs - fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)