1993-09-03 - Re: Remailer Reliability

Header Data

From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7e8c659907a22bf4188344bfe2723249853f48a3c893e70dc5f54fa8de60781e
Message ID: <CCsM6D.Cx8@twwells.com>
Reply To: <9309031826.AA09137@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-03 20:15:05 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Sep 93 13:15:05 PDT

Raw message

From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 93 13:15:05 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer Reliability
In-Reply-To: <9309031826.AA09137@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
Message-ID: <CCsM6D.Cx8@twwells.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <9309031826.AA09137@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>,
Carl Ellison <cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com> wrote:
: If you want reliability, you can take a page from the fault tolerance
: business.  Replicate the remailers.

If you're going to do that, why not go for extra security at the
same time? Instead of transmitting the same message to all of the
remailers, transmit different pieces to each and then reconstruct
the original from whatever pieces you get. Done right, this could
also be used to make traffic analysis harder.

Thread

• Return to September 1993

• Return to “b44729@achilles.ctd.anl.gov (Samuel Pigg)”
• Return to “bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)”
• Return to “cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)”
• Return to “Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>”

• Return to “Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>”

• 1993-09-03 (Fri, 3 Sep 93 11:30:34 PDT) - Re: Remailer Reliability - cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)
  • 1993-09-03 (Fri, 3 Sep 93 13:15:05 PDT) - Re: Remailer Reliability - bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
    • 1993-09-04 (Fri, 3 Sep 93 18:30:31 PDT) - Remailer Reliability - b44729@achilles.ctd.anl.gov (Samuel Pigg)
      • 1993-09-05 (Sun, 5 Sep 93 09:21:01 PDT) - Re: Remailer Reliability - Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
        • 1993-09-07 (Tue, 7 Sep 93 05:02:29 PDT) - Remailer Reliability - b44729@achilles.ctd.anl.gov (Samuel Pigg)
      • 1993-09-06 (Mon, 6 Sep 93 14:41:25 PDT) - Re: Remailer Reliability - Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>