From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 80fed7c54d93102814f91ad9c5d2adaaa279af3db3f294e8c571157f375a9cd2
Message ID: <9309292009.AA01715@toad.com>
Reply To: <9309290733.AA19505@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-29 20:11:47 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 29 Sep 93 13:11:47 PDT
From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 93 13:11:47 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Clipper specifics
In-Reply-To: <9309290733.AA19505@toad.com>
Message-ID: <9309292009.AA01715@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I said:
> Their spokesagency, NIST, has said that it will be illegal to encrypt
> on top of Skipjack or to mung the LEEF.
Checking the relevant document again, I think this is wrong:
--------------------
Federal Information Processing Standards Publication XX
1993 XX
Announcing the Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES)
[blah blah]
The security equipment shall ensure that the LEAF is transmitted
in such a manner that the LEAF and ciphertext may be decrypted
with legal authorization. No additional encryption or modification
of the LEAF is permitted.
[...]
--------------------
I remembered this text out of context. Correctly interpreted, it
looks like it's just a specification for devices implementing the
(voluntary, natch) Escrowed Encryption Standard. Sorry about that.
Eli ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
Return to September 1993
Return to “Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>”