1993-09-20 - Re: Definition of “Zero Knowledge” (fwd)

Header Data

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a5460b2714d532a885b8e5fb58eca4ab3688534ff6acf2be7baf75e019092e7f
Message ID: <9309200552.AA25175@toad.com>
Reply To: <9309200033.AA17197@bwnmr4.harvard.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-20 05:55:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 22:55:59 PDT

Raw message

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 22:55:59 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Definition of "Zero Knowledge" (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <9309200033.AA17197@bwnmr4.harvard.edu>
Message-ID: <9309200552.AA25175@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Check out a product called C-Shroud by ??Gimpel Software...
> I think it does this.. or at least tries....
 
C-Shroud does nothing with zero-knowledge proofs, or anything nearly
that sophisticated.  It simply mungs identifiers, strips comments and
whitespace, and things of that sort.  The idea is to get the machine
independence (heh) of C, with the unreadability (heh) of object code.
It can't really be that hard to read -- after all, most of the
human-work in disassembly is precisely the job of analyzing an
uncommented HLL program with meaningless identifiers.

   Eli   ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu





Thread