From: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ae78627f04055b9138e816b6c29efc2343a2550213bb3ae718e0b740f0bc5b67
Message ID: <199309301716.AA17376@misc.glarp.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-30 17:17:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 10:17:02 PDT
From: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 10:17:02 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: How about a pgp RFC...
Message-ID: <199309301716.AA17376@misc.glarp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
If you've followed the PEM working group in recent years, you may
have come to the conclusion as I have that it is not going anywhere,
and probably never will.
In an effort to make e-mail crypto more wide spread, I suggest we
draw up an internet-draft on the PGP message format, and the
algorithms used to send and receive messages.
At the moment I can think of nothing PEM can do that PGP cant.
Granted there are problems scaling the web-of-trust model, but PGP
is also capable of using a top down model (really just a subset of
the web model).
One thing such a draft is sure to do is send a clear signal to the
PEM group that they must either start swimming or sink.
brad
Return to September 1993
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”