From: M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (M. Stirner)
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b2a7ca9460fa3ef4dbd7c6eca02bdffacb7d65058f64f2bc553e58ccfa25a59f
Message ID: <2298.2C87C75D@shelter.FIDONET.ORG>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-04 00:05:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Sep 93 17:05:17 PDT
From: M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (M. Stirner)
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 93 17:05:17 PDT
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: remailer reliability
Message-ID: <2298.2C87C75D@shelter.FIDONET.ORG>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Uu> C'punks, it seems to me that the anonymous pool idea is underutilized
Uu> by the remailers. I suggest that a remailer variation be developed
Uu> that posts to an anonymous pool (some appropriate obscure newsgroup)
Uu> indicating that a message actually was sent from the final hop.
I'm not absolutely clear on what you are suggesting, but I suspect that
alt.test can probably be made to serve your purposes. Before the
password mess on penet (which kills automagic replies, unfortunately, as
they haven't passwords), I used the autoreplies that come form various
US & foreign sites in response to alt.test postings as a good shakedown
of penet remailer reliability. I haven't messed with alt.test in a
while so have pretty much forgotten the drill, but it was definitely
useful at the time.
*********************************************************************
* <m..stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org> - PGP Key D30909 via servers *
* > What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not <*
* > warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit <*
* > of resistance? Let them take arms!" - Thomas Jefferson, 1787 <*
*********************************************************************
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--
M. Stirner - via FidoNet node 1:125/1
UUCP: ...!uunet!kumr!shelter!28!M..Stirner
INTERNET: M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG
Return to September 1993
Return to “M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (M. Stirner)”