1993-09-30 - Re: Disturbing statistics on wiretaps

Header Data

From: cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d76339e829ca57ab5fd261a45a6ff431ec17c5e5e164e923ae1990784bd551cd
Message ID: <9309302116.AA05298@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-30 21:16:58 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 14:16:58 PDT

Raw message

From: cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 14:16:58 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Disturbing statistics on wiretaps
Message-ID: <9309302116.AA05298@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From: "George A. Gleason" <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
>Subject: Re: Disturbing statistics on wiretaps
>Message-Id: <93Sep29.023420pdt.14278-2@well.sf.ca.us>
>Date: 	Wed, 29 Sep 1993 02:34:18 -0700


>And of course it should be remembered that there is still an old drug-war
>thing on the books which allows 72 hours' interception without a court
>order.  Now depending on how that's interpreted, 72 hours are a lot of
>conversations.  This stuff can be used for background intelligence and
>investigation where it never winds up in court but is used to get
>information to be used in other ways.  "It's what they don't tell you..."


This can't be true.

I read DERD's paper on wiretap law and she certainly didn't mention
anything like this.

You must be making it up.

:-) ?

No,  :-(

 - Carl





Thread