1993-09-20 - Re: Definition of “Zero Knowledge”
Header Data
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e8d1183ae634c2a42f421e7457bf83cf9997ee017d58e76108722201b4b8784b
Message ID: <CDMs7n.AuB@twwells.com>
Reply To: <9309200038.AA04119@netcom.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-20 03:07:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 20:07:27 PDT
Raw message
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 20:07:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Definition of "Zero Knowledge"
In-Reply-To: <9309200038.AA04119@netcom.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <CDMs7n.AuB@twwells.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <9309200038.AA04119@netcom.netcom.com>,
Doug Merritt <doug@netcom.com> wrote:
: The most
: readable in depth treatment of that that I know of is "Goedel's Proof"
: by Ernest Nagel and James R. Newman, c. 1958 and still in print as
: a cheap paperback.
I have that book. It's a good one. It's exactly the sort of thing
I was referring to.
Thread
Return to September 1993
- Return to “bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)”
- Return to “doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)”
- Return to “khijol!erc@apple.com (Ed Carp)”
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
- 1993-09-20 (Sun, 19 Sep 93 17:40:55 PDT) - Re: Definition of “Zero Knowledge” - doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
- 1993-09-20 (Sun, 19 Sep 93 18:15:55 PDT) - Re: Definition of “Zero Knowledge” - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- 1993-09-20 (Sun, 19 Sep 93 18:41:58 PDT) - Re: Definition of “Zero Knowledge” - khijol!erc@apple.com (Ed Carp)
- 1993-09-20 (Sun, 19 Sep 93 20:07:27 PDT) - Re: Definition of “Zero Knowledge” - bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)