1993-09-18 - anon.penet.fi
Header Data
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: eb8e8367f6486fdd411e8e6dd9e421252bdf497f2a86a4ad0be5af656a41261d
Message ID: <9309181636.AA21944@ah.com>
Reply To: <9309181302.AA09384@newton.apple.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-18 16:36:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Sep 93 09:36:57 PDT
Raw message
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 93 09:36:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: anon.penet.fi
In-Reply-To: <9309181302.AA09384@newton.apple.com>
Message-ID: <9309181636.AA21944@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Therefore, it seems reasonable that remailers should refuse to mail into
>penet, unless and until a non-anonymous reply to anonymous mail facility
>becomes available there.
There is already non-pseudonymizing reply available for pseudonymous
mail. It periodically comes up on the list, and is periodically
corrected. The irony of the situation is that the solution was
invented on this list a few months ago.
Solution: if you send to na12345@anon.penet.fi, then your mail won't
be pseudonymized; if you send to an12345@anon.penet.fi, then your mail
will be pseudonymized.
an = anonymous
na = not anonymous
Eric
Thread
Return to September 1993
- Return to “collins@newton.apple.com (Scott Collins)”
- Return to “Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>”
Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
- 1993-09-18 (Sat, 18 Sep 93 06:06:53 PDT) - anon.penet.fi - collins@newton.apple.com (Scott Collins)
- 1993-09-18 (Sat, 18 Sep 93 09:36:57 PDT) - anon.penet.fi - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1993-09-18 (Sat, 18 Sep 93 10:45:30 PDT) - Re: anon.penet.fi - Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>