From: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
To: mjr@TIS.COM
Message Hash: f0f14e6338c0820caf573f96f5e99acdbf3445e190c9c8fc9b934d3277d1a1ca
Message ID: <9309242026.AA02558@banff.procase.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-24 20:30:40 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 Sep 93 13:30:40 PDT
From: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 93 13:30:40 PDT
To: mjr@TIS.COM
Subject: Re: NIST Explains Clipper "Review"
Message-ID: <9309242026.AA02558@banff.procase.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
An economic analysis would indeed be useful, especially if it led to
poll-type question like "Would you be willing to pay $100 extra for
a cellular phone to get secure communications that allowed government
wiretaps?"
Or as a sound bite: "At $100M+ a year, consumers and businesses are
subsidizing government wiretapping at the minimum cost of
$100,000 for each wiretap."
At that price, the government might as well give $100k to the suspects
under the condition that they stop doing whatever is considered illegal. ;^)
Paul E. Baclace
peb@procase.com
Return to September 1993
Return to “peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)”
1993-09-24 (Fri, 24 Sep 93 13:30:40 PDT) - Re: NIST Explains Clipper “Review” - peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)