1993-10-13 - Re: Spread-spectrum net (vulnerability of)

Header Data

From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: swc@uc1.ucsu.edu (Stuart W. Card)
Message Hash: 03564c14d82af1b6ddae14bc8e816172b12b5f44ddbf6acad99eb4d4e4ef8468
Message ID: <Qgir4Hm00VpH4LN18t@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <9310130219.AA14828@uc1.ucsu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-13 03:09:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 20:09:57 PDT

Raw message

From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 20:09:57 PDT
To: swc@uc1.ucsu.edu (Stuart W. Card)
Subject: Re: Spread-spectrum net (vulnerability of)
In-Reply-To: <9310130219.AA14828@uc1.ucsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Qgir4Hm00VpH4LN18t@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Has anyone pointed out that the ideal location for these
> packet repeaters is in the cars of as many people as possible?

This would defeat many detection methods, but would complicate the
software further, because it would need to be able to quickly compensate
for repeaters which travelled out of range.





Thread