1993-10-25 - Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy

Header Data

From: koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
To: klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu
Message Hash: 07f14fdf9460c0ed59f202af676726b131b0af0c82c2170c42148ab98eb5d971
Message ID: <9310251542.AA14668@nebula.lrcs.loral.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-25 15:45:16 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 08:45:16 PDT

Raw message

From: koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 08:45:16 PDT
To: klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu
Subject: Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy
Message-ID: <9310251542.AA14668@nebula.lrcs.loral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>I like the idea of encouraging people to digitally sign messages.  I
>also decided to try out ripem to see what its signed documents look
>like.

It seems if transmissions to a list must pass through a server, then
the server should be used for authentication.  Otherwise, the entire
thing is nothing but wasted bandwidth and `visual noise`.  (Unless
it is meant as make work for a three letter agency).





Thread