1993-10-24 - Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
Header Data
From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
To: hughes@ah.com
Message Hash: 243b1ba304e43fd88d219f0a2c27747fee1055699eb92d554b3d1cf6354278a5
Message ID: <9310240951.AA14727@ininx>
Reply To: <9310232111.AA03150@ah.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-24 09:53:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Oct 93 02:53:12 PDT
Raw message
From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 93 02:53:12 PDT
To: hughes@ah.com
Subject: Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
In-Reply-To: <9310232111.AA03150@ah.com>
Message-ID: <9310240951.AA14727@ininx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I support your signature proposal in either iteration. Don't be swayed by
armchair cypherpunks whining about how they might be inconvenienced by such a
policy. And I say these things even though I am myself not yet fully positioned
to sign my messages (though I'm close).
John E. Kreznar | Relations among people to be by
jkreznar@ininx.com | mutual consent, or not at all.
Thread
Return to October 1993
- Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
- Return to “jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)”
- Return to “Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>”
- Return to “rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Ray)”
Return to ““Robert J. Woodhead” <trebor@foretune.co.jp>”
- 1993-10-23 (Sat, 23 Oct 93 14:18:29 PDT) - Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1993-10-23 (Sat, 23 Oct 93 15:13:08 PDT) - Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
- 1993-10-23 (Sat, 23 Oct 93 15:28:28 PDT) - Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list - rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Ray)
- 1993-10-24 (Sat, 23 Oct 93 18:48:29 PDT) - Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list - “Robert J. Woodhead” <trebor@foretune.co.jp>
- 1993-10-24 (Sun, 24 Oct 93 02:53:12 PDT) - Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list - jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)