1993-10-12 - transmission facilities

Header Data

From: swc@uc1.ucsu.edu (Stuart W. Card)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2aa0ce5a3df27f8607afea9b0b2f4420bf7960c2869934f292397ed4b1c8a044
Message ID: <9310121633.AA11635@uc1.ucsu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-12 16:29:53 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 09:29:53 PDT

Raw message

From: swc@uc1.ucsu.edu (Stuart W. Card)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 09:29:53 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: transmission facilities
Message-ID: <9310121633.AA11635@uc1.ucsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Perhaps I am stating the obvious, but...

There has been a fair amount of discussion regarding setting up our
own networks of various kinds so that we don't have to live within
the strictures imposed upon us by providers (and regulators) of
'conventional' WAN's and financial networks.  This is good.  However,
thinking that this is a final solution is a delusion.  We are too few
in number; they COULD shut us down if they wanted to badly enough.

To become 'ineradicable', we must proliferate our approaches:
use LOTS of different physical plants and protocols, etc., with
numerous interrconnecting gateways.  That way, taking down a single
physical network, protocol, encryption algorithm or business strategy
does not eradicate the underground internet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stuart W. Card, Consultant, Card & Associates -- Research & Development
Box 153 RR 1 Newport Rd Utica NY 13502         315-735-1717 / FAX -8469
swc@uc1.ucsu.edu or cards@top.cis.syr.edu           "Who is John Galt?"





Thread