From: hiscdcj@lux.latrobe.edu.au (Dwayne)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 07:26:28 PDT
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Subject: Re: distributed autonomous networks
In-Reply-To: <9310090005.AA11624@anchor.ho.att.com>
Message-ID: <9310121421.AA25641@lux.latrobe.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Meteor Burst is real stuff, though the last time I knew a little about it
>the bandwidth was pretty low; e.g. you got 300 baud average throughput
>doing bursts of 4800 baud with really heavy-duty forward error correction,

Hmm, not much use unless you had some sort of massivley parallel setup.
Still, it's an idea.

>since it's a pretty sporadic medium.  Power usage is really low,
>and typical applications are things like telemetry from snow-depth recorders
>out in the mountains, where line-of-sight is essentially unavailable.

Yes, but I assume that we are talking about moving a bit more data than this.

>I don't know how much bandwidth or area you get out of it, or how traceable
>it is - our meteor expert retired years ago, and was looking at problems like
>how to build radio data networks that weren't bothered by nuclear explosions.

I don't think the Powers That Be will get _that_ heavy...  :-)

>If there's a spare satellite slot available, ALOHANET technology is a reasonably
>efficient way to use it.

Err, which is?

Dwayne.