From: ferguson@icm1.icp.net (Paul Ferguson x2044)
To: perobich@ingr.com
Message Hash: 339f25408646bda19f33974ccc68b0afdd32ced84607ad113739a6c0837ddb6e
Message ID: <9310182312.AA02437@icm1.icp.net>
Reply To: <199310182026.AA12159@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-18 22:12:30 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Oct 93 15:12:30 PDT
From: ferguson@icm1.icp.net (Paul Ferguson x2044)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 93 15:12:30 PDT
To: perobich@ingr.com
Subject: Dan Rather, et al. (WAS: Leisure Suit Larry)
In-Reply-To: <199310182026.AA12159@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
Message-ID: <9310182312.AA02437@icm1.icp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
> > Uh, its not "Lance," its "Larry" Detweiler, as in Leisure Suit
> > Larry. (Sorry, Larry.)
>
> Well, Dorothy Denning referred to "Larry Detwiler"'s comments on the
> ITAR in the latest RISKS, which I don't have handy. I always thought
> it was Lance.
>
> Could there be more than one? Is "tcmay" also posing as one of the L.
> Detwilers? Are we being pseudospoofed? Maybe someone should call Dan
> Rather.
I've been sitting back, watching the signal-to-noise on the list
fluctuate with a smidgeon of a grin on my face.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"
Personally, I think that the list is just going through a few minor
changes, the worst of which are new people checking into "something that
they had heard about."
Face it -- the net grows a bit more "open" every day.
As far as Dan Rather goes, I'd bet he wouldn't even understand.
,-)
Cheers,
_____________________________________________________________________________
Paul Ferguson
Mindbank Consulting Group fergp@sytex.com
Fairfax, Virginia USA ferguson@icp.net
Return to October 1993
Return to “paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)”