1993-10-18 - Re: ANON: The Economist on South Korea

Header Data

From: Edward Elhauge <ee@lever.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4bcf9fee7eeffbdee614f4e1b39b39231cd45a8daf509e50b1b10d65baebc2cf
Message ID: <m0op2Bx-0001ZtC@lever.lever.com>
Reply To: <9310181820.AA02600@ah.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-18 22:12:29 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Oct 93 15:12:29 PDT

Raw message

From: Edward Elhauge <ee@lever.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 93 15:12:29 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: ANON: _The Economist_ on South Korea
In-Reply-To: <9310181820.AA02600@ah.com>
Message-ID: <m0op2Bx-0001ZtC@lever.lever.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <9310181820.AA02600@ah.com>, Eric Hughes writes:
>      [...] One of Mr Kim;s first presidential acts was to bare his
>   assets.  Then ministers, MPs and top civil servants were all
>   required to disclose their net worth.  To no one's surprise, while
>   the president's people were mostly clean, many of the old guard
>   turned out to be rolling in wealth whose origins they could not
>   readily explain. Many resigned.
>
>      The "real names" reform, announced on August 12th, was Mr Kim's
>   most radical step yet.  The issue had been hotly debated for over a
>   decade.  Hitherto South Koreans had been able to keep bank accounts
>   in any name they cared to invent; convenient for tax evasion, and
>   for recycling the cash-stuffed white envelopes that for decades
>   have routinely oiled the country's wheels of business and
>   politics alike.
>A new target market?

My first reaction to this post was, "Are we supposed to feel sorry for these
people?" But then I realized that the real problem was giving other people
enough power over you that you depend on them to be honest.
--
  Edward Elhauge  |  "The only thing worse than being talked about
 Lever Industries |   is not being talked about."
   San Francisco  |              -- Oscar Wilde
   ee@lever.com   |





Thread