1993-10-28 - Re: Signing our keys

Header Data

From: an41418@anon.penet.fi (wonderer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 57c6d0609434de7d0294046fb2f5caeed5f5dfb693e9be8ecd233321f2ba80ed
Message ID: <9310282009.AA21887@anon.penet.fi>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-28 20:12:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Oct 93 13:12:42 PDT

Raw message

From: an41418@anon.penet.fi (wonderer)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 93 13:12:42 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:  Signing our keys
Message-ID: <9310282009.AA21887@anon.penet.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Well, Paul Robichaux, actually, that message was not intended
for the list, as you seem to realize. However, given your
message, and the thoughts that it sparked, I guess it wasn't
such a bad thing after all that my lack of sleep caused me
to be careless.

I'd like to know how many people check the signatures at the
end of messages. Maybe whenever there's a questionable one,
or if someone claims that a message seemingly from them
is a spoof.

So, my question is: how do I get people to agree to sign
my key when I don't really exist? Is my net reputation
enough for you?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3

iQBVAgUBLNARpB1kTJuroDD9AQEiEAH/etWoc0WA89+Rb9ojM4jRQflZQNjVrnYx
r8YSYpq1k+G2W6eDPA+m0mQnWqaKGizKwPJecXkpQGfW5YawWSOg6w==
=kZgv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.





Thread