From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 669031d6a1d26615ffad7c78aa935a6b41706db411cc2415a968e25349ee29b2
Message ID: <9310260550.AA13270@netcom5.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9310260427.AA00771@tamsun.tamu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-26 05:55:51 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 22:55:51 PDT
From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 22:55:51 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: We Don't Need No Steenking Digital Superhighway!!
In-Reply-To: <9310260427.AA00771@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Message-ID: <9310260550.AA13270@netcom5.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
What the Sam Hill is this?
> > CPSR NII Paper
> > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
> > COMPUTER SCIENTISTS RAISE SOCIAL AND DESIGN CONCERNS
> > ABOUT THE INFORMATION HIGHWAY
....
> I really don't see why we need NII at all. We already have internet.
> Cable companies are rushing to provide high bandwidth networks for consumers.
> NII seems to be nothing more than WelfareNet. Which isn't surpising since
> CPSR praises systems like IGC (Econet, PeaceNet, etc) which are much more
> expensive than Netcom, Panix, Digex, and provide shoddier service.
>
> Sam Hill
Very true! In fact, it is the EFF's talk about the "need" for such a
government effort that really worries me about the EFF (a mild kind of
worry...I haven't completely detweilered over it). I'm not clear just
how central are these issues to the EFF, currently, but I urge us all
to try to convince them that the "electronic frontier" really doesn't
need government-built channels and routes.
With a zillion forms of fiber, cable, satellites, land lines,
undersea cables, lots of competing companies, etc., there just is *no
need* for a nationalized effort to build some kind of bureacratic
dream of what the people "need."
And unlike the Interstate Highway System (actually called the National
Defense Transportation System, or somesuch, clearly an
autobahn-inspired Eisenhowwer defense project), which arguably needed
a government-level effort to obtain the land, the crossings, etc., no
such government-level effort is needed to lay more cable, put up more
satellites, etc.
In fact, the relatively anarchic growth of the Net (many nets, of
course) is a major strength and advantage.
We helped kill the Superconducting Supercollider, now we can help kill
Al Gore's TipperNet fantasy.
--Tim May
--
..........................................................................
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments.
Higher Power: 2^756839 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available.
Note: I put time and money into writing this posting. I hope you enjoy it.
Return to October 1993
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”