1993-10-05 - Re: EFF GIF file recall notice: is EFF the new CERT?

Header Data

From: ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)
To: “L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Message Hash: 8aa99f506e68a7225f2a5e0d61a93e39282b5a65a852a238a383dd80e1bf90ce
Message ID: <199310051547.AA23289@eff.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-05 15:49:09 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Oct 93 08:49:09 PDT

Raw message

From: ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 93 08:49:09 PDT
To: "L. Detweiler" <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Subject: Re: EFF GIF file recall notice: is EFF the new CERT?
Message-ID: <199310051547.AA23289@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I included the GIF warning in EFFector Online for unsuspecting BBS
operators.  Child pornography is not protected speech, and challenging
child pornography laws is not currently on EFF's agenda -- but protecting
BBS sysops from having their systems seized is.  I figured those who sought
to challenge the child pornography laws would poo poo the message.  I guess
I figured right.

BTW, before I ran the article, Mike Godwin and I had a discussion about
whether the *cops* would be angry, thinking we were obstructing justice.  I
guess I just can't win!

I'd like to request that this discussion be taken off the cypherpunks list,
since it is not on point to the list.  O.k. by you?
Shari






Thread