From: ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)
To: “L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Message Hash: 8aa99f506e68a7225f2a5e0d61a93e39282b5a65a852a238a383dd80e1bf90ce
Message ID: <199310051547.AA23289@eff.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-05 15:49:09 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Oct 93 08:49:09 PDT
From: ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 93 08:49:09 PDT
To: "L. Detweiler" <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Subject: Re: EFF GIF file recall notice: is EFF the new CERT?
Message-ID: <199310051547.AA23289@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I included the GIF warning in EFFector Online for unsuspecting BBS
operators. Child pornography is not protected speech, and challenging
child pornography laws is not currently on EFF's agenda -- but protecting
BBS sysops from having their systems seized is. I figured those who sought
to challenge the child pornography laws would poo poo the message. I guess
I figured right.
BTW, before I ran the article, Mike Godwin and I had a discussion about
whether the *cops* would be angry, thinking we were obstructing justice. I
guess I just can't win!
I'd like to request that this discussion be taken off the cypherpunks list,
since it is not on point to the list. O.k. by you?
Shari
Return to October 1993
Return to “ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)”
1993-10-05 (Tue, 5 Oct 93 08:49:09 PDT) - Re: EFF GIF file recall notice: is EFF the new CERT? - ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)