1993-10-28 - Re: Security of PGP private keys

Header Data

From: J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>
To: zeek@io.com
Message Hash: a31b3600346e85a9e7192d73b0337b7dbb01b69837bd7c32686103e2a8683c55
Message ID: <9310280634.AA04635@triton.unm.edu>
Reply To: <9310280613.AA09120@actlab.rtf.utexas.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-28 06:38:05 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Oct 93 23:38:05 PDT

Raw message

From: J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 93 23:38:05 PDT
To: zeek@io.com
Subject: Re: Security of PGP private keys
In-Reply-To: <9310280613.AA09120@actlab.rtf.utexas.edu>
Message-ID: <9310280634.AA04635@triton.unm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


According to zeek@io.com:
> 
> 
> 
> *> > PGP secret keys are protected by a password.  Yet people have said that one
> *> > should not keep one's secret keyring on an insecure machine.  Why?
> *> 
> *> Passwords are often guessable.
> 
> Passwords may also be picked up over telephone lines.  It is good to keep
> them short, wacko, and in human memory.  
> 
> #$%Osd(@ is a good one.  
> 

Ya right, about as good as qwerty, which is in many wordlists these days.


J. Michael Diehl   ;^)  |*The 2nd Amendment is there in case the 
mdiehl@triton.unm.edu   | Government forgets about the 1st!  <RL>
Mike.Diehl@f29.n301.z1  |*God is a good Physicist, and an even 
    .fidonet.org        | better Mathematician.  <Me>
al945@cwns9.ins.cwru.edu|*I'm just looking for the opportunity to 
 (505) 299-2282 (voice) | be Politically Incorrect! <Me>
Can we impeach him yet? |*Protected by 18 USC 2511 and 18 USC 2703. 




Thread