1993-10-09 - Re: EFF GIF file recall n

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a8c76aa3d4124ca6b3c8408fca21b1e9ac15822f4f527e71d96e0054dd9ca9d5
Message ID: <199310091851.AA01370@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-09 18:55:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Oct 93 11:55:57 PDT

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 93 11:55:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: EFF GIF file recall n
Message-ID: <199310091851.AA01370@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


To: cypherpunks@toad.com
S >Child pornography is not protected speech, and challenging
S >child pornography laws is not currently on EFF's agenda

Didn't the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decide that the transport and sale 
provisions (unknowing posession) of the federal kiddie porn law were 
unconstitutional?  Wouldn't a warning like yours risk converting unknowing 
to knowing posession.

Duncan Frissell

--- WinQwk 2.0b#0
                                                                                     





Thread