1993-10-24 - Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list

Header Data

From: “W. Kinney” <kinney@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
To: hughes@ah.com
Message Hash: afdb8c42514d9efd17a14d97da3950c8988531d95bda1c831a05915c2f3c7c8f
Message ID: <199310241732.AA23689@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-24 17:33:10 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Oct 93 10:33:10 PDT

Raw message

From: "W. Kinney" <kinney@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 93 10:33:10 PDT
To: hughes@ah.com
Subject: Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
Message-ID: <199310241732.AA23689@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----



What's the point of resorting to contrived inducements to include signatures? 
If there's a real reason to do it, people will, and if not, they won't.

Perhaps we could just all by-and-large agree to sign posts? I'll start with 
this one...

                                 -- Will




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3

iQCVAgUBLMpmVvfv4TpIg2PxAQHrlAP5AaRssrPAO/sNsBkPVGKcJbn5z9exBlqd
JqG9nfx5HuinNFANovpGO5+zDp0fDtnQ4c1e86vsONQ3wSklXZx30IYG/h7cX4T9
rXNpxZVsT26lIHIrAxEXKBCRwhtlaO19+G1nN5DLChXF/DlnQiTRsmjxhPI1NI5r
9WyyI02GEDk=
=xy8S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Thread