From: Peter shipley <shipley@merde.dis.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 11:34:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <9310251827.AA14837@merde.dis.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: tpc-rp-request@aarnet.edu.au
Return-Path: <tpc-rp-request@aarnet.edu.au>
Message-Id: <9310251638.AA17387@skigo.graphics.cornell.edu>
To: tpc-rp@aarnet.edu.au
Subject: Re: My first hole-punching! 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 24 Oct 93 22:13:01 PDT."
             <9310250513.AA03502@antigone.com> 
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 12:38:23 -0400
From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@graphics.cornell.edu>
X-Mts: smtp
X-Ploder: dailim
Precedence: bulk


>Anonymous sending throws a new twist on the tpc guidelines which  
>allow me to lock out a sender... 

Yes, I think so.  I've been thinking about setting up a server, but I
think it would only make sense to lock out all *@anon.penet.fi and
similar sources.

- -Mitch

------- End of Forwarded Message