From: owen@autodesk.com (D. Owen Rowley)
To: catalyst-remailer@netcom.netcom.com
Message Hash: b4039c49771335781ba9581e4dc4310eaba01e23e42abfa8775de3dde3e05faf
Message ID: <9310191753.AA26732@lux.YP.acad>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-19 18:22:31 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Oct 93 11:22:31 PDT
From: owen@autodesk.com (D. Owen Rowley)
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 93 11:22:31 PDT
To: catalyst-remailer@netcom.netcom.com
Subject: Re: Crypto Anarchy (jrk@...)
Message-ID: <9310191753.AA26732@lux.YP.acad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Undoubtedly we could launch into a discussion of why it is anybody
> with a pocket full of change can walk up to a payphone and leave a
> variety of threats at the whitehouse switchboard - the phone
> company need not fear having its equipment seized, while a computer
> used in forwarding mail containing the same threats will probably be
> taken along with anything else the SS feels like taking.
Did you forget that the phone companies have a long history of co-operation
with federal authorities ?
> >Quick -- how many remailers have the support of the university? How many
> >boards of trustees -- at state universities, often linked to the government
> >-- will back them, if the Secret Service ``requests'' that they be shut
> >down.
> Gee, I don't know. Does the phone company have any government deals,
> say to manufacture products using a government designed chip, that may
> be at risk if its found out that phone company equipment is constantly
> being used for threats??
The phone companies have agreements with law enforcement that amount to
the same thing!
The reason that Law enforcement wants chip level intervention capability
is that they fear loosing capabilities they already have!
LUX ./. owen
Return to October 1993
Return to “owen@autodesk.com (D. Owen Rowley)”
1993-10-19 (Tue, 19 Oct 93 11:22:31 PDT) - Re: Crypto Anarchy (jrk@…) - owen@autodesk.com (D. Owen Rowley)