From: nate@rodin.VIS.ColoState.EDU
To: jingoro@rahul.net (Kasuga Jingoro)
Message Hash: b52af0fc6e86b50f307dada9c236b9279f1952a44ae5a1e2cbf7749d8e0c7a21
Message ID: <9310131522.AA00413@rodin.VIS.ColoState.EDU>
Reply To: <199310131356.AA13313@bolero.rahul.net>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-13 15:27:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Oct 93 08:27:02 PDT
From: nate@rodin.VIS.ColoState.EDU
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 93 08:27:02 PDT
To: jingoro@rahul.net (Kasuga Jingoro)
Subject: Re: The Bank of the Internet!?
In-Reply-To: <199310131356.AA13313@bolero.rahul.net>
Message-ID: <9310131522.AA00413@rodin.VIS.ColoState.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
writes Kasuga Jingoro:
>
>> Plenty. Find me a workstation with the sort of uptime a 3090 running
>> MVS will give you.
>
>Since you asked... I don't know what the average uptime of a 3090 is,
>but from several years of experience as a Unix sysadmin, most of the
>Sun systems I've been involved with easily had uptimes ranging months
>at a time. Powering down a system for maintenance or adding equipment
>was more common than crashes. If you insist on promoting the reliability
>of the 3090, perhaps you'd be so kind as to cite some figures. I'd
>hazard to guess though that a 3090 could be sufficiently mismanaged to
>produce dismal uptimes as well as a workstation can.
I have (well, I manage) a sun 4/280 server, and it was once up for
180 days straight, but we restarted it just because it had been up
for what we thought was a really long time... In my experience, Big Blue
machines only talk to themselves correctly, and don't talk to much else.
Just my $0.02
-nate
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Nate Sammons email: nate@VIS.ColoState.Edu
| Colorado State University Computer Visualization Laboratory
| Finger nate@monet.VIS.ColoState.Edu for my PGP key
| #include <std.disclaimer>
| Title 18 USC 2511 and 18 USC 2703 Protected --> Monitoring Forbidden
+--------+ Always remember "Brazil"
Return to October 1993
Return to “zeek@IO.COM (zeek)”