1993-10-15 - Re: An idea.

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d356789593a0e1d88783f651ee7a4f55d127cb95c6e1b792218513ac5f23a70a
Message ID: <9310151546.AA16910@snark.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9310151501.AA14843@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-15 15:47:08 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Oct 93 08:47:08 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 93 08:47:08 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: An idea.
In-Reply-To: <9310151501.AA14843@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
Message-ID: <9310151546.AA16910@snark.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Carl Ellison says:
> If all you're worried about is entrapment, you need only ask the person
> in question if s/he works for any law enforcement or surveillance agency.
> If they lie, then anything after that is entrapment.

Not true. Its a common myth, though. I imagine Duncan Frissell or one
of the other lawyers on the list could expand on this.

Perry

Thread

• Return to October 1993

• Return to “cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)”
• Return to “Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>”

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”

• 1993-10-15 (Fri, 15 Oct 93 08:02:08 PDT) - Re: An idea. - cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)
  • 1993-10-15 (Fri, 15 Oct 93 08:47:08 PDT) - Re: An idea. - “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
  • 1993-10-18 (Mon, 18 Oct 93 06:27:14 PDT) - Re: An idea. - Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>