From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e038e85f9b3e3edfe616086880cdc5e05a03819c729c4dec660cefbfa0c35d52
Message ID: <9310021623.AA09378@ah.com>
Reply To: <199310020422.AA01659@xtropia>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-02 16:38:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Oct 93 09:38:47 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 93 09:38:47 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
In-Reply-To: <199310020422.AA01659@xtropia>
Message-ID: <9310021623.AA09378@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>I have personally reconstructed many shredded
>documents done with commercial-grade shredders. It's extremely easy and
>I wonder why the "security conscious" even bother with the waste of
>time.
Cost.
It's much more expensive to read a shredded document than an integral
one. As always, though, if the expense to reconstruct is smaller than
the value of the documents, one should use a better method.
Eric
Return to October 1993
Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
Unknown thread root