From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ef1e808575b4ad1909be35f29454ed459651c58cc63fdab5ff8599412d0d3d59
Message ID: <9310090945.AA03379@netcom5.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-09 09:45:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Oct 93 02:45:52 PDT
From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 93 02:45:52 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Agenda, Goals, Flames...Comments
Message-ID: <9310090945.AA03379@netcom5.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I wrote this reply to Matthew Landry, who raised some complaints about
the direction of this list, the role of the "leaders," and so on. I
sent it to him personally, so as not to add to the already heavy
volume of stuff on this list, especially the complaints of the last
few days.
I think the term "leader" is inappropriate. Several of us got the group
rolling a little over a year ago, but the anarchic nature of the
mailing list (source of strengths as well as weaknesses).
In Matthew's post he on the one hand blasts the elitist attitude of
Eric Hughes and myself while in the next paragraph blasting the lack
of action taken by the "leaders" to control flames and set up systems
to help newcomers.
Anyway, I enjoyed a political piece Matthew wrote a couple of weeks or
so ago, and I told him this. So his piece tonight (2:30 a.m) merited a
response.
And though some of you are no doubt sick of seeing these issues
debated, I've decided to forward my letter to him to all of you, as I
think some points need to be made.
I've removed one or two sentences from the version I mailed to
Matthew.
Forwarded message:
Return to October 1993
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
1993-10-09 (Sat, 9 Oct 93 02:45:52 PDT) - Agenda, Goals, Flames…Comments - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)