From: “kpj@sics.se” <kpj@sics.se>
To: Al Billings <mimir@u.washington.edu>
Message Hash: 1013aa41f03fb255b2d68274f4bab94481093ddd97bb92bfb2dc4103047df50f
Message ID: <9311221837.AA23712@sics.se>
Reply To: <Pine.3.87.9311221003.A29429-0100000@goren1.u.washington.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-22 18:38:00 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Nov 93 10:38:00 PST
From: "kpj@sics.se" <kpj@sics.se>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 93 10:38:00 PST
To: Al Billings <mimir@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Secure Drive 1.0 is here!
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.87.9311221003.A29429-0100000@goren1.u.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <9311221837.AA23712@sics.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
| It isn't very smart asking him in a public forum, especially one that is
| pretty known to be monitored by at least some government agents. No
| matter what his opinion is, he's going to have to say "No." It is ILLEGAL
| for him to export it and you just basically stood up and yelled "Fire!"
| to every Fed on the list.
Naturally. I expect him to refuse. My whole question is whether it is
valid to use Copyleft on code which is not freely copyable over national
boundaries.
Return to November 1993
Return to “Nathan Loofbourrow <loofbour@cis.ohio-state.edu>”